Ruth Franklin has a review of David Mitchell’s Black Swan Green in this week’s New Republic. She bemoans the trite superlatives that populate positive book reviews, praises Dale Peck, laments the decline of standards we have for great books, and bashes Heidi Julavits and the Believer’s anti-snark stance. She then goes on to laud Black Swan and Mitchell’s writing in a review that, except for its opening complaints about the state of book reviewing, is the exact sort of engaged, anti-snark essay that the Believer favors. In other words, it’s a good, well-written review. Perhaps, she should stick to reviewing books and stop trying to take down other book reviewers. I would also like to point out that suggesting that Dale Peck has high standards for fiction is a bit suspicious. Franklin would have been much better off citing James Wood. But of course, Peck is provocative, which she seems to think is better than simply appreciating good novels. I must admit that I have at least one thing in common with Franklin: I, like her, read and liked Black Swan Green.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. The demise of book reviewing The New York Times uses the occasion of the Atlanta...
  2. With sadness: Gotham Book Mart in trouble It looks like Gotham Book Mart in New York is...
  3. Kepler’s in Trouble Again? The San Francisco Examiner reported last week that Kepler’s may...
  4. Kakutani slams Pynchon and the return of the dot-com boom After her glowing review of Dave Eggers’s new book, Michiko...
  5. Jonathan Lethem on Roberto Bolaño, or the best novel of the year? In this weekend’s New York Times Book Review Jonathan Lethem offers high...